Why accounting standards matter, and who makes them
Common rules, two sets in India, and who does what.
Two honest firms ship goods on 3 April but invoice them on 28 March. One counts the sale this year, the other next year. Who is right?
Accounting standards give uniformity, comparability, transparency and guidance for auditors. India has two sets, AS and Ind AS. Ind AS are converged with IFRS: in harmony with them, not a copy. ICAI drafts, NFRA advises and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs notifies.
A company invoices ₹50 lakh of sales on 28 March but ships the goods on 3 April. One accountant counts the sale in this year, another in the next. Both think they are right. Without a common rule, two honest firms report different profits for the same facts.
In plain wordsAn accounting standard is an authoritative rule on how an item must be recorded, measured, shown and explained, so that all firms treat the same event the same way.
Exam definitionAccounting standards prescribe the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of transactions in financial statements. They form the core of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and bind the entities required to follow them.
| Reason | What it gives |
|---|---|
| Uniformity and comparability | Statements prepared the same way, so investors can compare firms and years |
| Transparency and reliability | A common accounting language, which reduces ambiguity |
| Global alignment | Ind AS are converged with IFRS, so cross-border investors can read Indian accounts |
| Fraud prevention | A standard format and treatment makes manipulation harder |
| Guidance for auditors | Clear yardsticks against which accounts are checked |
Two sets in India. The older Accounting Standards (AS) are notified under the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006. The newer Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) follow the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and are notified under the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015. A company follows one set or the other, depending on its size and listing.
Convergence, not adoption. India converged with IFRS: it aimed for harmony and kept the right to modify a standard where Indian conditions called for it. That is why Ind AS are numbered like IFRS (Ind AS 16 for IAS 16) but are not word-for-word copies.
Who does what. The Accounting Standards Board of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) prepares the drafts. An independent body advises the Government: the notes name the National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards (NACAS), and under the Companies Act 2013 this role now goes through the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA). The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) notifies the standards as rules.
Don’t say Ind AS replaced AS everywhere. India has had two sets side by side. Companies covered by Ind AS follow it, and all others continue under AS. The line between them is drawn by net worth and listing, and it has been revised more than once.
Where it breaks. Standards cannot cover every case, so they leave room for judgement, and judgement can be bent. Detailed rules can also push firms to arrange deals to fit the letter and not the spirit. Compliance with a standard is not the same as a fair picture.
For exams. Know the five reasons, the two sets, the meaning of convergence, and the roles of ICAI, NFRA and the MCA.
ICAI drafts, NFRA advises, MCA notifies; convergence is harmony, not copying.
Go deeper for practitioners
The numbering clue. Ind AS follow the IFRS numbering, so Ind AS 7 corresponds to IAS 7 (cash flows). The older AS follow their own series, so AS 3 is the cash flow standard. A question that gives only a number needs you to know which series it belongs to.
A decision. A group has one listed company and three small unlisted subsidiaries. What problems could arise from the two sets of standards, and who would need to reconcile them?
1. ‘Convergence’ with IFRS means…
Not quite. The answer is “Aiming for harmony with IFRS, with changes where Indian conditions need them”. Convergence is not complete adoption. India kept the right to modify a standard where necessary.
2. Who notifies Ind AS as rules?
Not quite. The answer is “The Ministry of Corporate Affairs”. ICAI drafts and NFRA advises, but the Ministry of Corporate Affairs notifies the standards.
3. Which is a main purpose of accounting standards?
Not quite. The answer is “Comparability of statements across firms and years”. Standards do not change profit or replace audit. They make accounts comparable and reliable.
“If you were an investor comparing two firms that each followed a different set of rules, what would you need to check first?”
Still unsure, or see it differently? Ask the community about thisYou’ll sign in first if you haven’t. Your note above stays private.
- Reasons: uniformity, transparency, global alignment, fraud prevention, guidance for auditors.
- Two sets in India: AS (2006 Rules) and Ind AS (2015 Rules, converged with IFRS).
- Convergence means harmony, not copying.
- ICAI drafts, NFRA advises, the Ministry notifies.
ICAI drafts, NFRA advises, MCA notifies; convergence is harmony, not copying.