Social marketing and green marketing
Marketing behaviour change for society, and sustainability sold honestly.
Can marketing techniques be used to sell a behaviour rather than a product?
Social marketing sells a behaviour for society's good; green marketing sells sustainable products, and greenwashing is its main risk.
A district health office has a budget and a message: wash hands with soap before meals. Telling people is easy. Getting them to do it every day is the hard part, and that is a marketing problem.
In plain wordsSocial marketing uses the tools firms use to sell soap to sell a healthier or more responsible habit.
Exam definitionSocial marketing is the design, implementation and control of programmes calculated to influence the acceptability of social ideas, involving product planning, pricing, communication, distribution and marketing research (Philip Kotler and Gerald Zaltman, 1971).
Social marketing applies commercial marketing techniques to influence behaviour that benefits individuals and society. Its key components are a target audience, a desired behaviour change, exchange theory and a marketing mix. Exchange theory says the change must offer benefits that outweigh its perceived costs. India's pulse polio and Swachh Bharat campaigns are examples.
The handwashing campaign, component by component (an illustration):
- Audience: parents of young children in the district.
- Behaviour: washing hands with soap before meals.
- Exchange: the benefits (fewer sick days, less spent on doctors) must outweigh the costs (soap, water, the effort of a new habit).
- Mix: the product is the habit; the price is the rupees and effort; the place is soap and water at the school tap; the promotion is school demonstrations and wall paintings.
| Aspect | Social marketing |
|---|---|
| Objectives | Behaviour change, community development, public participation, social welfare |
| Strategies | Media and social media campaigns, community engagement, partnerships with NGOs and government |
| Challenges | Cultural sensitivity; measuring long-term impact |
Green marketing markets environmentally sustainable products and practices: eco-friendly products, sustainable processes, eco-labelling and green advertising. Its aims are to promote eco-friendly consumption and build a responsible brand image. Its tools include transparency, CSR initiatives and attention to the whole product life cycle.
Its main risk is greenwashing: false or exaggerated environmental claims, which breed consumer scepticism. A detergent sold in a green box with a leaf and the word ‘eco’, but an unchanged formula, is greenwashing. Green products may also cost more to make.
Don't confuse social marketing with societal marketing, or with social media marketing. Social marketing sells a behaviour for society's good, often for a government or NGO. The societal marketing concept is a firm's philosophy of balancing customers' wants, its profit and society's long-term interest. Social media marketing is simply marketing on social platforms.
Where it breaks. Behaviour change is slow, and its long-term impact is hard to measure. A campaign that works in one community can offend another. In green marketing, many people say they prefer green products but buy on price and habit; researchers call this the attitude–behaviour gap.
For exams. Know Kotler and Zaltman (1971), the four components, exchange theory, and the meaning of greenwashing. A common trap is to swap social and societal marketing.
Sell behaviour change for society; sell sustainability honestly.
1. Who introduced the idea of social marketing, in 1971?
Not quite. The answer is “Philip Kotler and Gerald Zaltman”. Kotler and Zaltman introduced social marketing in 1971. Kotler and Armstrong is tempting because Kotler appears in both, but they wrote the principles of sustainable marketing.
2. Parents agree that handwashing matters but skip it, because soap feels costly and the habit is new. Which component of the campaign is failing?
Not quite. The answer is “Exchange: the benefits do not yet outweigh the costs”. The parents know and agree, so awareness is not the problem. They judge the costs higher than the benefits, so the campaign must cut the costs or raise the benefits.
3. A firm prints ‘eco’ and a leaf on a detergent box but leaves the formula and pack unchanged. What is the main risk?
Not quite. The answer is “Greenwashing that breeds consumer scepticism”. A green claim with nothing behind it is greenwashing, and it makes buyers doubt green claims in general. Eco-labelling is tempting, but a genuine label rests on a real environmental advantage.
- My view
Green marketing and what is taken, may it grow back
Green marketing asks that consumption leave the earth able to renew itself. The Atharvaveda's hymn to the Earth prays that what is dug from her may quickly grow again, and that her vitals and heart not be wounded. It is a prayer, not a policy, but it states the idea of renewal plainly.
A reading offered for reflection, not a claim about what the authors meant.
यत्ते भूमे विखनामि क्षिप्रं तदपि रोहतु । yat te bhūme vikhanāmi kṣipraṃ tad api rohatu. “What I dig from you, O Earth, may that quickly grow again.” Atharvaveda 12.1.35
About this text: AtharvavedaDiscuss
What it addsA prayer to the Earth that what is dug from her may quickly grow again, without wounding her vitals and heart.
Where they differIt is a prayer, not a policy. Green marketing adds eco-friendly products, eco-labelling, transparency and attention to the product life cycle.
- My view
Greenwashing and water in an unbaked pot
Greenwashing wins sales with false claims. The Kuṟaḷ says that wealth gained by deceit and kept is like water poured into an unbaked clay pot: it will not hold. It speaks of deceit in general, not of environmental claims.
A reading offered for reflection, not a claim about what the authors meant.
“Guarding wealth gained by deceit is like keeping water in a pot of unbaked clay.” சலத்தால் பொருள்செய்தே மார்த்தல் பசுமண் கலத்துள்நீர் பெய்திரீஇ யற்று. Tirukkuṟaḷ 660
About this text: TirukkuṟaḷDiscuss
What it addsAn image: wealth gained by deceit is like water kept in a pot of unbaked clay; it will not hold.
Where they differThe couplet speaks of deceit in general. Greenwashing is a specific risk of false environmental claims in green marketing.
Modern: Green marketing
Classical: what is taken, may it grow back
Modern: Greenwashing
Classical: water in an unbaked pot
“Think of a product sold as eco-friendly. What would convince you its claim is not greenwashing?”
Still unsure, or see it differently? Ask the community about thisYou’ll sign in first if you haven’t. Your note above stays private.
- Social marketing (Kotler and Zaltman, 1971): audience, behaviour change, exchange theory, marketing mix.
- Exchange theory: the change must offer benefits that outweigh its perceived costs.
- Green marketing: eco-friendly products, sustainable processes, eco-labelling, green advertising.
- Greenwashing breeds scepticism; social marketing is not the societal marketing concept.
Sell behaviour change for society; sell sustainability honestly.